Literature in English

Resultado de imagen de bandera inglesa
  • ALBRECHT, P.A; BRAUM, S.; Deficiencies in the Development of European Criminal Law, ELJ 1999, no. 3;
  • ALLEGREZZA, S.; Collecting Criminal Evidence Across the European Union:The European Investigation Order Between Flexibility and Proportionality (in:) S. Ruggeri (ed.), Transnational Inquiries and the Protection of Fundamental Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A Study in Memory of Vittorio Grevi and Giovanni Tranchina, Heidelberg 2013;
  • BACHMAIER WINTER, L., “Cross-border Investigation of Tax Offences in the EU: Scope of Application and Grounds for Refusal of the European Investigation Order”. EuCLR European Criminal Law Review 2007, nº 7;
  • BACHMAIER WINTER, L.; “European Investigation Order for Obtaining Evidence in the Criminal Proceedings. Study of the Proporsal for a European Directive”. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 2010, nº 9;
  • BACHMAIER, L.; Mutual Recognition and Cross-Border Interception of Communications: The Way Ahead for the European Investigation Order. Hart Publising, England, 2017;
  • BACHMAIER-WINTER, L.; The Role of Proportionality Principle in Cross-Border Investigations Involving Fundamental Rights (in:) S. Ruggeri (ed.), Transnational Inquiries and the Protection of Fundamental Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A Study in Memory of Vittorio Grevi and Giovanni Tranchina, Heidelberg 2013;
  • BACHMAIER WINTER, L.; “Transnational Evidence. Towards the Transposition of Directive 2014/41 Regarding the European Investigation Order in Criminal Matters”. Eucrim The European Criminal Law Associations’ Forum 2015, nº 2;
  • BELFIORE, R.; Movement of Evidence in the EU: The Present Scenerio and Possibile Future Developements, EJCCLCJ 2009, no. 17;
  • BELFIORE, R.; The European Investigation Order in Criminal Matters: Developments in Evidence-gathering across the EU, European Criminal Law Review 2015, Heft 3;
  • BELFIORE, R.; The European Investigation Order in Criminal Matters: Developments in Evidence-gathering across the EU, European Criminal Law Review 2015, No. 5;
  • CASSESE, A.; International Law, Oxford 2005;
  • DENZA, E.; The 2000 Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, CMLR 2003, vol. 40;
  • ESER, A.; SIEBER,U.; KREICKER H.; (eds.), National Prosecution of International Crimes, Berlin 2005;
  • GARDOCKI, L.; Transfer of Proceedings and Transfer of Prisoners as New Forms of International Co-operation (in:) A.Eser, O.Lagodny (eds), Principles and Procedures for a New Transnational Criminal Law, Freiburg im Breisgau 1992;
  • H. FISCHER, H.; KRESS, C.; ROLF LEDER, S.; (eds.), International and National Prosecution of Crimes under International Law. Current Developements, Berlin 2004;
  • HELENIUS, D.; Mutual Recognition in Criminal Matters and the Principle of Proportionality: Effective Proportionality or Proportionate Effectiveness?, New Journal of European Criminal Law 2014, vol. 5, issue 3;
  • HELMUT, S.; “Mutual Recognition in Times of Crisis- Mutual Recognition in Crisis? An Analysis of the New Jurisprudence on the European Arrest Warrant”, EuCLR, n.3, 2018, v. 8, pp. 317-331.
  • HIRST, M.; Jurisdiction and the Ambit of Criminal Law, Oxford 2003;
  • JANSSENS, CH.; The Principle of Mutual Recognition in EU Law, Oxford 2013;
  • JARIN, N.; “The European Investigation Order and Evidence Requests in Military Criminal Cases: A Matter of ‘Uniform Application’?”, EuCLR, n.3, 2018, v. 8, pp.368-377.
  • KAPARDIS, A.; The European Arrest Warrant in Cyprus and Constitutional Concerns (w:) P. Hofmański, A. Górski, The European Arrest Warrant and its Implementation in the Member States of the European Union, Warszawa 2008;
  • KELSEN, H.; Principles of International Law, New York in. 1966;
  • KEIJZER, N.; Locus delicti exceptions (in:) N.Keijzer, E.van Sliedregt (eds), The European Arrest Warrant in Practice, Hague 2009;
  • KOSKONNIEMI, M.; What is International Law for? (w:) M.D. Evans, International Law, Oxford 2003;
  • MANGIARACINA, A.; New and Controversial Scenario in the Gathering of Evidence at the European Level: The Proposal for a Directive on the European Investigation Order, Utrecht Law Review 2014, vol. 10, issue 1;
  • RUGGERI, S.; Transnational Evidence and Multicultural Iquiries in Europe. Developments in EU Legislation and New Challenges for Human Rights-Oriented Criminal Investigation in Cross-border Cases. Springer, Berlín, 2014;
  • RUGGERI, S.; Transnational Inquiries and the Protection of Fundamental Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A Study in Memory of Vittorio Grevi and Giovanni Tranchina, Heidelberg 2013;
  • RUGGERI, S.; Transnational Inquiries and the Protection of Fundamental Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A Study in Memory of Vittorio Grevi and Giovanni Tranchina, Springer, Berlín, 2013;
  • RUGGERI, S.; Introduction to the Proposal of a European Investigation Order: Due Process Concerns and Open Issues (in:) S.Ruggeri (ed.), Transnational Evidence and Multicultural Inquiries in Europe. Developments in EU Legislation and New Challenges for Human Rights-Oriented Criminal Investigations in Cross-border Cases, Heidelberg 2014;
  • RUGGERI, S. Horizontal cooperation, obtaining evidence overseas and the respect for fundamental rights in the EU. From the European Commission’s proposals to the proposal for a directive on a European Investigation Order: Towards a single tool of evidence gathering in the EU? (in:) S. Ruggeri (ed.), Transnational Inquiries and the Protection of Fundamental Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A Study in Memory of Vittorio Grevi and Giovanni Tranchina, Heidelberg 2013;
  • V. MISTILEGAS, Databases in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Lessons for the Centralisation of Records and their Maximum Exchange (w:) C. Stefanom, H. Xanthaki (eds.), Towards a European Criminal Records, Cambridge 2008;

Other Documents In English